# silvanus@azet.sk / 2005-07-21 10:18:05 +0200:
> I have two functions: funcA() drops a row from table A, funcB() drops a
> row from table B that references table A. funcA() calls funcB() and
> issues a delete command after returning from funcB(). I get an error,
> stating that it can not be done, because there is a row in B that can
> not be deleted with deleting the particular row from A.
>
> So now: Why does this happen? Is it because a function is a transaction?
> why do series of update/delete operations work fine in a single
> function, but fail as soon as one of these operations is performed by
> function? Is there any way to avoid this behavior?
Show us definitions of the tables and functions in question.
--
How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb?
You don't know, man. You don't KNOW.
Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991
