Is there a reason against using something like the perl one we use on the
main site, and, I believe, on pgfoundry? instead of the horde stuff?
So far, the only problems we've had reported with php4.4.0 have been horde
related issues, so I'm really loath to downgrade if we can help it :(
From what I can read in the release notes, the "cause" of the problem is a
fix they did to the API to eliminate some memory leakage ... which is also
why the bump'd the second # from 3->4 :(
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Chris Ryan wrote:
> I looked at updagrading to a newer version of Horde at one point
> but they had changed their architecture in some way that wasn't
> compatible with the way I was incorporating the CVS code. The
> incorporation has always been the tricky part. Setting up something
> that wasn't incorporated wouldn't be too much trouble if we wanted to
> try and work with newer stuff.
>
> Chris
>
> --- "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Dave Page wrote:
>>
>>> Oh, so it got upgraded then? Was that before or after it started
>>> segfaulting?
>>
>> After, that was why I did the upgrade, to clean that stuff up ... but
>> the
>> *old* horde stuff has some bad code in it that the newer horde stuff
>> has
>> already fixed, and Chris has some ancient horde stuff in place :(
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
