On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 10:48:56AM +0200, Dawid Kuroczko wrote:
> As for the char/varchar type -- I was wondering. Worst case
> scenario for UTF-8 (correct me on this) is when 1 character
> takes 4 bytes. And biggest problem with char/varchar is that
> length indicator takes 4 bytes... How much overhead would
> it be to make a length variable, for example:
>
> (var)char(1)-char(63) -- 1 byte length + string
> char(64)-char(16383) -- 2 byte length + string
> char(16384)-text -- 4 byte length + string, like now
Well, you get another issue, alignment. If you squeeze your string
down, the next field, if it is an int or string, will get padded to a
multiple of 4 negating most of the gains. Like in C structures, there
is padding to optimise access.
> This would reduce length of char(5) string from 9 bytes to
> 6 bytes, char(2) from 6 bytes to 3 bytes (for multibyte chars
> it would be a win also).
The only types that won't require padding if they are next field are
bool, "char" and cstring. So char(1-4) will actually go from 8 to 4
bytes in most cases. char(5-8) will go from 12 to 8 bytes.
> I don't know the internals too well (read: at all), but I guess there
> would be a problem of choosing which length of length to use --
> would it be possible to make some sort of on-the-fly mapping
> when creating tables -- varchar(224) is text_2bytelength,
> text is text_4bytelength, char(1) is text_1bytelength...
At the moment there are two basic types: variable length and fixed
length as defined by the type id. Fixed length are stored as is.
Variable length is a 4 byte length plus the string. The two highest
bits are flags. AFAIK it's the typlen value that decides the decoding,
the type itself is irrelevent.
I suppose somebody could create a new encoding but I don't know how
hard that would be...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.
