Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruno Wolff III
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles
Date
Msg-id 20050630125422.GA29327@wolff.to
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 13:39:09 +0200, Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote:
> 
> The standard talks about 2 distinct concepts: USER and ROLE (4.34). I'm
> not sure it is a good idea to drop the user concept to replace it by role.
> If you do so, you may miss something about what roles are about.

I think it is a good idea to make users synonymous with roles with
regard to privileges. This will make checking for access simpler
and mistakes less likely. The special part of being a user in addition
to a role is that being a user allows for authentication.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Open items
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles