Re: COnsidering a move away from Postgres - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jason Tesser
Subject Re: COnsidering a move away from Postgres
Date
Msg-id 200506301018.16294.jtesser@nbbc.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: COnsidering a move away from Postgres  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: COnsidering a move away from Postgres
Re: COnsidering a move away from Postgres
List pgsql-general
HI

On Thursday 30 June 2005 9:20 am, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jason Tesser <jtesser@nbbc.edu> writes:
> > 1. Our dev plan involves alot of stored procedures to be used and we have
> > found the way this is done in PG to be painful. (ie.  To return multiple
> > record from different tables you have to define a type.
>
> FWIW, this won't be essential any more in 8.1.  See the examples in the
> development documentation:
> http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/xfunc-sql.html#XFUNC-OUTPUT-P
>ARAMETERS
> http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/plpgsql-declarations.html#PLP
>GSQL-DECLARATION-ALIASES
> http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/plpgsql-control-structures.ht
>ml#PLPGSQL-STATEMENTS-RETURNING

I might be missing it but how does this help me.  What I would like is to be
able to return multiple records from a select statement that return multiple
columns from different tables without having to create a type.  This is why
it is painful for us.  The management of types is bad because as far as I
know there is no alter type and the depencies become a nightmane if you ever
need to change something.


<snip>

--
Jason Tesser
Developer for NMI
jtesser@nbbc.edu
Eph 2:8-10

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ajay Dalvi
Date:
Subject: Error while installing Slony 1.1.0 for PostGreSql version 7.3.4
Next
From: Sven Willenberger
Date:
Subject: Re: COnsidering a move away from Postgres