> > I have a new idea --- pg_storage_size().
>
> I'm not against that one, but I think Tom's point is vaild. I cannot
> think of anything better at the moment though (maybe pg_component_size,
> but that's equally random) :-(
>
> Anyone else? Please? Someone? Anyone? :-)
Maybe pg_trait_size() or pg_property_size() will do?
--
Victor
---- Msg sent via @Mail ISP MiTS - http://www.mits.lv/
