Re: Occupied port warning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Occupied port warning
Date
Msg-id 200506281514.30040.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Occupied port warning  ("Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: Occupied port warning
Re: Occupied port warning
Re: Occupied port warning
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> IIRC, in previous versions any bind failure was fatal, but in 8.0 we
> decided to be slightly more forgiving and only bail out if we failed
> to bind at all.

I realize that, but I would like to know where that bright idea came 
from in violation of all other principles of this and any other 
software.  I recall that it had something to do with IPv6, but I'm not 
sure.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: Implementing SQL/PSM for PG 8.2 - debugger
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Implementing SQL/PSM for PG 8.2 - debugger