Re: uptime function to postmaster - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: uptime function to postmaster
Date
Msg-id 200506151252.j5FCqpS14993@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: uptime function to postmaster  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
List pgsql-patches
Neil Conway wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > We need to preceed our function names with pg_ for cases like this where
> > we are supplying pg-specific behavior.
>
> We do? I'm not sure I can see much of a consistent naming convention for
> functions like these: version(), obj_description(), has_xyz_privilege(),
> format_type(), set_config(), and the like are surely "pg-specific", for
> example.

Yea, seems we aren't consistent.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: user's exception PL/pgSQL
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_autovacuum patch to display db name in log file is broken