Dave,
> Count you out why? Is it the fact that I'm advocating keeping everything
> in one site, or that I'm suggesting we don't need advanced features like
> customisable workflows or other whizz-bang features? What exactly do you
> want that you don't think you will get from what I'm suggesting?
In a nutshell? A place where someone who wants to submit and article can
do so in < 10 minutes (*including* any markup time). A place where
someone wanting to translate an article can do it in
point-and-click-and-translate time. A place where someone can easily
locate the article which covers their problem if it exists.
Barring that, I'm waiting for at least an acknowledgement from you that
there's a direct relationship between easy-to-use and
number-of-contributors. If you're convinced that there's no relationship
at all, then I don't think we can communicate.
I'm not looking for whizz-bang; in fact, my idea for TechDocs had been to
wait for Gavin to go 1.0 on Framewerk and use that. It's about as
stripped down as you get on CMS.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
