Phil Endecott wrote:
> Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> > The integrated version
> > of autovacuum that didn't make the cut before 8.0 avoids this problem
> > since the autovacuum data is stored in the database.
>
> What is the status of this? Is it something that will be included in
> 8.1 or 8.0.n? I might be able to patch the current code but that
> doesn't seem like a useful thing to do if a better solution will arrive
> eventually. I am currently running vacuums from a cron job and I think
> I will be happy with that for the time being.
I will post about integrating pg_autovacuum into the backend for 8.1 in
a few minutes.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
