Re: psql backslash consistency - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Robert Treat
Subject Re: psql backslash consistency
Date
Msg-id 200505271714.57862.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: psql backslash consistency  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: psql backslash consistency  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
On Friday 27 May 2005 15:09, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Robert Treat wrote:
> > > I see hardly any use case for showing only user-defined functions
> > > or types by default.  I think consistency is not necessarily
> > > desirable here.
> >
> > See the archives for previous discussion and/or use cases.
>
> I didn't find any.  Nevertheless, while there are undoubtedly some uses
> for everything, making this the default behavior does not seem
> acceptable.

ISTM it is more acceptable than you're willing to admit.

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-04/msg00009.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-04/msg00102.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-09/msg00199.php

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: psql backslash consistency
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Fix PID file location?