Re: Regression failures: time, timetz, horology - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Regression failures: time, timetz, horology
Date
Msg-id 200505261525.j4QFPJV28614@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Regression failures: time, timetz, horology  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org> writes:
> > I'm getting time, timetz, and horology regression failures in HEAD
> > on Solaris 9 / gcc 3.4.2.  So are other machines in the build farm,
> > such as this one:
> 
> I'll bet a nickel this broke it:
> 
> 2005-05-25 23:48  momjian
> 
>     * src/: backend/utils/adt/datetime.c,
>     interfaces/ecpg/pgtypeslib/interval.c: Display only 9 not 10 digits
>     of precision for timestamp values when using non-integer
>     timestamps.  This prevents the display of rounding errors for
>     common values like days < 32.

Yea, backing out.  I thought I tested it, but I guess not.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Regression failures: time, timetz, horology
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: foreign keys and RI triggers