On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 05:52:43PM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Thursday 12 May 2005 01:32, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > > FWIW, I don't see the issue as "internal vs external" at all.
> > > What's bothering me is whether these views can be considered
> > > sufficiently more stable and better designed than the physical
> > > system catalogs to justify recommending that application
> > > designers should rely on the views instead of the catalogs.
> > > That point doesn't seem to me to have been proven. The recent
> > > arguments in favor seem to boil down to "novices will find these
> > > easier to use", which is very possibly true, but novices don't
> > > have the same needs as programs.
> >
> > As lead phpPgAdmin developer, I'm officially in favour of them.
> > The main reason being all the extra fruit they have that shows
> > database size, etc.
> >
>
> As non-lead phpPgAdmin developer, I'd be against using them in
> phppgadmin. (note this doesnt mean I am against them in pgsql
> itself)
On what grounds?
> > That means we can display this meta information in phpPgAdmin and
> > not worry about having to re-implement it all.
> >
>
> You have to query something... doesn't bother me to go to the
> source.
A PostgreSQL developer has shown in this very thread that it is
extremely easy to screw up a query against those catalogs. Maybe
you're better than he is, but that's not a reason to keep something
simpler out.
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter david@fetter.org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
