Re: Partitioning / Clustering - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Bruno Wolff III
Subject Re: Partitioning / Clustering
Date
Msg-id 20050511041224.GA1475@wolff.to
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Partitioning / Clustering  ("Adam Haberlach" <adam@mediariffic.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 08:02:50 -0700,
  Adam Haberlach <adam@mediariffic.com> wrote:
>
>
> With all the Opteron v. Xeon around here, and talk of $30,000 machines,
> perhaps it would be worth exploring the option of buying 10 cheapass
> machines for $300 each.  At the moment, that $300 buys you, from Dell, a
> 2.5Ghz Pentium 4 w/ 256mb of RAM and a 40Gb hard drive and gigabit ethernet.
> The aggregate CPU and bandwidth is pretty stupendous, but not as easy to
> harness as a single machine.

That isn't going to be ECC ram. I don't think you really want to use
non-ECC ram in a critical database.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Partitioning / Clustering
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Configing 8 gig box.