Re: lastval() - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: lastval()
Date
Msg-id 200505110326.j4B3QaL00310@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: lastval()  ("John Hansen" <john@geeknet.com.au>)
List pgsql-patches
John Hansen wrote:
> Neil Conway wrote:
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 10:56 AM
> > To: Dennis Bjorklund
> > Cc: pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCHES] lastval()
> >
> > Dennis Bjorklund wrote:
> > > Here is a small patch that implements a function lastval()
> > that works
> > > just like currval() except that it give the current value
> > of the last
> > > sequence used by nextval().
> >
> > What do people think of this idea? (Tom seems opposed, I'm
> > just wondering if there are other opinions out there.)
>
> I'm all for it. Even more so if the 'currval(void) called before
> nextval(seq_name)' error message could be supressed by a GUC variable
> and return 0 instead.

Why zero and no error?

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: "Andrew Dunstan"
Date:
Subject: Re: lastval()
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: lastval()