Re: Interval support for Postgres - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Oliver Siegmar
Subject Re: Interval support for Postgres
Date
Msg-id 200504301043.04574.o.siegmar@vitrado.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Interval support for Postgres  (Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>)
Responses Re: Interval support for Postgres
List pgsql-jdbc
On Saturday 30 April 2005 10:25, Kris Jurka wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2005, Oliver Siegmar wrote:
> > > On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Oliver Siegmar wrote:
> > > > Give pgjdbc_interval5.diff a new try ;-)
> >
> > Thanks. Could you also add it to the 8.0 branch? That'd be great!
>
> That's not really our policy, new features go into head, bug fixes only in
> released branches.  This isn't a terribly invasive patch, but it does make
> some behavioral differences (notably an existing parser of getValue()
> would only expect ISO format, not pg format).  I don't think a convincing
> case can be made for needing this in 8.0, but you are free to try and
> convince other users and developers.

I understand. Well, it depends a lot on when 8.1 driver will be released as a
stable version (or how stable prereleases are for productional use). If a 8.1
JDBC-Driver release is planned for mid-2005, I'm okay. Otherwise it would be
imho a too long time to work with prereleases to get interval support.

...just my two cents...


Oliver



pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Kris Jurka
Date:
Subject: Re: Interval support for Postgres
Next
From: Kris Jurka
Date:
Subject: Re: Interval support for Postgres