As a user, I would definetly prefer to see 8.1
released sooner with the feature set listed below,
than wait another 6+ months for a few other features.
Additionally, the beta may go smoother/faster if you
don't have too many huge features going in at once.
Just my opinion.
Later
Rob
--- Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote:
> You might remember that when we released 8.0, the
> plan was to have a
> 12-month development cycle for 8.1, unless there
> were Win32 problems
> that required complex fixes, in which case we would
> have a shorter 8.1
> cycle.
>
> Well the good news is that there have been almost no
> Win32 problems, but
> the other good news is that we are getting a lot of
> powerful features
> for 8.1 already:
>
> o two-phase (Heikki Linnakangas, almost done)
> o multiple out function paramters (Tom, done)
> o bitmappted indexes (Tom, almost done)
> o shared row locks (Alvaro, almost done)
> o integrated auto-vacuum (Bruce)
> o buffer cache fixes for SMP (Tom, done)
>
> It is possible all these items will be done by
> sometime in June. Now,
> if that happens, do we want to continue with the
> 12-month plan or
> shorten the 8.1 release cycle, perhaps targeting a
> release in the
> September/October timeframe?
>
> The current core proposal is to do feature freeze on
> July 1, with the
> understanding that we will be done most of the items
> above by then and
> have the outstanding patches applied.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian |
> http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
> 359-1001
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts
> Road
> + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown
> Square, Pennsylvania 19073
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose
> an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
