Re: BUG #1634: Configure step for build does not define HAVE_POSIX_SIGNALS - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: BUG #1634: Configure step for build does not define HAVE_POSIX_SIGNALS
Date
Msg-id 200504271958.j3RJw5S17886@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to BUG #1634: Configure step for build does not define HAVE_POSIX_SIGNALS  ("Don Courtney" <donald.courtney@sun.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
Don Courtney wrote:
>
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference:      1634
> Logged by:          Don Courtney
> Email address:      donald.courtney@sun.com
> PostgreSQL version: 8.0/8.1
> Operating system:   Solaris 10
> Description:        Configure step for build does not define
> HAVE_POSIX_SIGNALS
> Details:
>
> Subj: ./src/include/pg_config.h Does not define HAVE_POSIX_SIGNALS.
>
> To recreate the problem on Solaris run the source build step for
> configuring.
>
> $ ./configure
>
> Then
>
> $ cd ./src/include
>
> and see that there is no "1" in the define statement
>
> #define HAVE_POSIX_SIGNALS

We merely define the macro --- we don't need to set it to '1'.

> For postgres to run properly without ZOMBIE processes the workaround is to
> hand edit this to:
>
>   /* Define to 1 if you have the POSIX signal interface. */
> #define HAVE_POSIX_SIGNALS 1    <---- ADD 1

That fixes it?  You will notice all the mentions of HAVE_POSIX_SIGNALS
are testing if it is defined or not.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: "Mike G."
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #1629: subquery IN returns incorrect results
Next
From: Oliver Jowett
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #1628: JDBC bug with regard to text column data type