Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >>
> >>Secondly I would say that an ARC patent is ridiculous based on the above
> >>experience.
> >
> >
> > ARC is 2Q with the ability to dynamically resize the four cache pools.
>
> So ARC is 2Q++. My point exactly :)
So you are saying "++" isn't patentable? I don't understand that.
You are saying that there are no completely new ideas in databases, and
that marginal improvements are not patentable?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
