Re: BUG #1609: Bug in interval datatype for 64 Bit timestamps - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Oliver Siegmar
Subject Re: BUG #1609: Bug in interval datatype for 64 Bit timestamps
Date
Msg-id 200504211701.24736.oliver@siegmar.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #1609: Bug in interval datatype for 64 Bit timestamps  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Thursday 21 April 2005 15:57, Tom Lane wrote:
> I don't think it's a new bug, seeing that I didn't change the code
> for the ISO case.
>
> I see the imprecise result only in the non-integer-datetime case; is
> it acting differently for you?

You're right - it has nothing to do with your patch. I thought that because I
had the problem on one system (with your patch) but not on another (without
your patch). But these systems are having another difference - 64bit integer
datetimes.

I have this imprecise only on the non-integer-datetime server, too.

> If it is only the float case, some imprecision is to be expected.

So everything is okay?


Oliver

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Ron Mayer
Date:
Subject: Transactions and "create or replace function"
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: empty array can crash backend using int_array_enum from contrib.