Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > Treating shutdown checkpoint markers as xlog switches is possible but
> > gives problems since archive_command is a SUSET variable. On replay we
> > wouldn't necessarily know whether a shutdown checkpoint was treated as
> > an xlog switch when it was written, so we'd need to attempt to switch
> > and look beyond the checkpoint marker, just in case. That makes me
> > uncomfortable.
>
>
> However, this still begs the question of why we are bothering.
> I disagree with the goal in this particular case anyhow: I do not
> think it's necessary, safe, nor sane for a shutdown to try to archive
> the last XLOG segment. Even if we fixed the xlog mechanism to end the
> file there, I really have a problem with the idea that the archiver
> should try to start a fresh archiving cycle at shutdown.
Doing the archive at server shutdown eliminates one of the "must
document" items, so the system behaves more predictably that it does
not. It is not required --- it is a usability issue.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
