Re: [HACKERS] Implementation of SQLCODE and SQLERRM variables - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Implementation of SQLCODE and SQLERRM variables
Date
Msg-id 200504191435.j3JEZnL04114@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Implementation of SQLCODE and SQLERRM variables for  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Guys, is this patch ready for application?  I think so, but am not 100%
> > sure.
>
> I haven't read the code yet, but in any case I still object to choosing
> Oracle-like names for Oracle-incompatible functionality.  We need to
> settle on better names.

OK, are the values returned not the same as the Oracle values?  If they
aren't, you are right, we need another name.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Implementation of SQLCODE and SQLERRM variables
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Implementation of SQLCODE and SQLERRM variables