Re: SETOF function call - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Philip Yarra
Subject Re: SETOF function call
Date
Msg-id 200504191216.07640.philip@utiba.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SETOF function call  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: SETOF function call  (Olivier Thauvin <olivier.thauvin@aerov.jussieu.fr>)
List pgsql-hackers
sizeof(Datum)  == sizeof(long) - is that compatible with %d formatting (I'm 
guessing something like vsprintf takes place in elog)? Wouldn't this need %ld 
or %lu? 

Sorry if this misses the point, I wasn't clear from original post if the 
segfault was on elog or after it.

Regards, Philip.

On Tuesday 19 April 2005 11:53, Tom Lane wrote:
> Olivier Thauvin <olivier.thauvin@aerov.jussieu.fr> writes:
> > Datum
> > header_querytxt(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
> > {
> >     elog(NOTICE, "querytxt");
> >     Datum tag;
> >     /* converting TEXT value to integer one */
> >     tag = DirectFunctionCall1(rpmtagvalue, PG_GETARG_TEXT_P(1));
> >     elog(NOTICE, "querytxt %d", tag);
> >     /* header_query = function accepting integer instead text)
> >     PG_RETURN_POINTER(DirectFunctionCall2(header_query,
> >     PG_GETARG_BYTEA_P_COPY(0), tag));
> > }
> 
> If that's a cut-and-paste, then you seem to be short a */ on the second
> comment ...
> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
>       joining column's datatypes do not match
> 
> -----------------
> Utiba Pty Ltd 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by Utiba mail server and is 
> believed to be clean.
> 
> 


-----------------
Utiba Pty Ltd 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by Utiba mail server and is 
believed to be clean.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: SETOF function call
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Best practices: MERGE