Re: Functionscan estimates - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: Functionscan estimates
Date
Msg-id 20050409152257.GG93835@decibel.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Functionscan estimates  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Functionscan estimates
List pgsql-performance
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 12:00:56AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Not too many releases ago, there were several columns in pg_proc that
> were intended to support estimation of the runtime cost and number of
> result rows of set-returning functions.  I believe in fact that these
> were the remains of Joe Hellerstein's thesis on expensive-function
> evaluation, and are exactly what he was talking about here:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2002-06/msg00085.php
>
> But with all due respect to Joe, I think the reason that stuff got
> trimmed is that it didn't work very well.  In most cases it's
> *hard* to write an estimator for a SRF.  Let's see you produce
> one for dblink() for instance ...

Actually, if the remote database supported a way to get a rows estimate
from the query passed to db_link, it would be trivial, since you'd just
pass that back.

In fact, having such a function (estimate_rows_for_sql(text)) would
probably be very useful to functions that wanted to support returning a
rows estimate.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant               decibel@decibel.org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Any way to speed this up?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Functionscan estimates