pgsql: If we're going to have a non-panic check for held_lwlocks[] - Mailing list pgsql-committers

From tgl@svr1.postgresql.org (Tom Lane)
Subject pgsql: If we're going to have a non-panic check for held_lwlocks[]
Date
Msg-id 20050408141836.1583953217@svr1.postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-committers
Log Message:
-----------
If we're going to have a non-panic check for held_lwlocks[] overrun,
it must occur *before* we get into the critical state of holding a
lock we have no place to record.  Per discussion with Qingqing Zhou.

Modified Files:
--------------
    pgsql/src/backend/storage/lmgr:
        lwlock.c (r1.26 -> r1.27)
        (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lwlock.c.diff?r1=1.26&r2=1.27)

pgsql-committers by date:

Previous
From: dpage@pgfoundry.org (User Dpage)
Date:
Subject: pginstaller - pginst: Prep for 8.0.2
Next
From: cmaj@pgfoundry.org (User Cmaj)
Date:
Subject: pgaccess - pgaccess: latest version from Robert Strong, with licensing