Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?
Date
Msg-id 20050404004151.GV53309@decibel.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 07:29:02AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> This argument doesn't hold too much weight. Namely because there are only
> 3-5 really popular languages out there. They are marketing languages.
> The are languages you include because your database doesn't "sound"
> complete with out them. Regardless if you can download them separately.
> People are lazy. They don't want to download them separately.
>
> I see those as:
>
> plPgsql (for Oracle people)
> plPerl
> plPHP

What databases support perl or php stored procs/functions? Or python for
that matter?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant               decibel@decibel.org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Strange plpgsql performance, diff plperl and plpgsql
Next
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: psql and mysql