Re: Questions regarding interaction of stored functions - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bill Moran
Subject Re: Questions regarding interaction of stored functions
Date
Msg-id 20050327183942.100df4c4.wmoran@potentialtech.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Questions regarding interaction of stored functions and transactions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> writes:
> > Let's take the following fictional scenerio:
>
> > BEGIN;
> > INSERT INTO table1 VALUES ('somestring');
> > INSERT INTO table1 VALUES ('anotherstring');
> > SELECT user_defined_function();
> > COMMIT;
>
> > In this case, user_defined_function() does a lot more table manipulation.
> > I don't want that to be done if any statement prior fails, but it seems as
> > if it's always done, regardless.  It seems as if the second INSERT is not
> > executed if the first fails, but the function is always called.
>
> Sorry, I don't believe a word of that.  If the first insert fails,
> everything will be rejected until COMMIT.
>
> Possibly you need to show a less fictionalized version of your problem.

You're right, Tom.  I can't get a simplified reproduction of the problem.

That means that the problem is occurring somewhere else in my program.

--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bricklen Anderson
Date:
Subject: Re: plpgsql no longer exists
Next
From: "Guy Rouillier"
Date:
Subject: Re: dblinks?