On Sat, 19 Mar 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
> That means we can go ahead with providing a GUC variable to make the
> array size user-selectable. I was thinking of calling it either
> "local_buffers" (in contrast to "shared_buffers") or "temp_buffers" (to
> emphasize the fact that they're used for temporary tables). Anyone have
> a preference, or a better alternative?
temp_buffers sounds more descriptive ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
