Log Message: ----------- Revise hash join code so that we can increase the number of batches on-the-fly, and thereby avoid blowing out memory when the planner has underestimated the hash table size. Hash join will now obey the work_mem limit with some faithfulness. Per my recent proposal (hash aggregate part isn't done yet though). Modified Files: -------------- pgsql/src/backend/executor: nodeHash.c (r1.88 -> r1.89) (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/executor/nodeHash.c.diff?r1=1.88&r2=1.89) nodeHashjoin.c (r1.67 -> r1.68) (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/executor/nodeHashjoin.c.diff?r1=1.67&r2=1.68) pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/path: costsize.c (r1.137 -> r1.138) (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/path/costsize.c.diff?r1=1.137&r2=1.138) pgsql/src/backend/utils/adt: selfuncs.c (r1.171 -> r1.172) (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/utils/adt/selfuncs.c.diff?r1=1.171&r2=1.172) pgsql/src/include/executor: hashjoin.h (r1.34 -> r1.35) (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/include/executor/hashjoin.h.diff?r1=1.34&r2=1.35) nodeHash.h (r1.35 -> r1.36) (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/include/executor/nodeHash.h.diff?r1=1.35&r2=1.36) nodeHashjoin.h (r1.28 -> r1.29) (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/include/executor/nodeHashjoin.h.diff?r1=1.28&r2=1.29) pgsql/src/include/nodes: execnodes.h (r1.122 -> r1.123) (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/include/nodes/execnodes.h.diff?r1=1.122&r2=1.123) pgsql/src/include/utils: selfuncs.h (r1.21 -> r1.22) (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/include/utils/selfuncs.h.diff?r1=1.21&r2=1.22)
pgsql-committers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных