Re: multi billion row tables: possible or insane? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: multi billion row tables: possible or insane?
Date
Msg-id 20050304220507.GH2209@decibel.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to multi billion row tables: possible or insane?  (Ramon Bastiaans <bastiaans@sara.nl>)
List pgsql-performance
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 10:34:29AM +0100, Ramon Bastiaans wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am doing research for a project of mine where I need to store several
> billion values for a monitoring and historical tracking system for a big
> computer system. My currect estimate is that I have to store (somehow)
> around 1 billion values each month (possibly more).

On a side-note, do you need to keep the actual row-level details for
history? http://rrs.decibel.org might be of some use.

Other than that, what others have said. Lots and lots of disks in
RAID10, and opterons (though I would choose opterons not for memory size
but because of memory *bandwidth*).
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant               decibel@decibel.org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: stig erikson
Date:
Subject: Re: What is the postgres sql command for last_user_id ???
Next
From: Alex Turner
Date:
Subject: Re: multi billion row tables: possible or insane?