Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL vs. Oracle, 2005 report card - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL vs. Oracle, 2005 report card
Date
Msg-id 20050215213951.GO52357@decibel.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL vs. Oracle, 2005 report card  (Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>)
List pgsql-general
They also say that mysql is free, which isn't the case for commercial
applications.

On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 07:36:44PM +0530, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> On Friday 11 Feb 2005 6:07 pm, Marques Johansson wrote:
> > A recent Slashdot thread on MySQL performance
> > (http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/02/11/038232&from=rss)
> > contains a comment mentioning the following Fermilab report from May 2003:
> >
> > http://www-css.fnal.gov/dsg/external/freeware/mysql-vs-pgsql.html
> >
> > With the release of PostgreSQL 8.0, how does PostgreSQL currently stand?
>
> That seems to be fairly old and hence out-of-sync. Things have move a lot
> since, for all the products involved.
>
> But still I find it rather harsh on postgresql.  8K row limit is long gone and
> postgresql does support online backup, to mention a few.
>
> PostgreSQL now has native windows port, tablespaces and many many replication
> solutions, not to mention a list of companies that offer PostgreSQL support.
>
>  Shridhar
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
>                http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>

--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant               decibel@decibel.org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: bradsnobar@netscape.net (Bradley D. Snobar)
Date:
Subject: Re: Schema comparison tool
Next
From: "Andrew Hall"
Date:
Subject: Re: Lost rows/data corruption?