Tom Lane wrote:
> I just noticed that our port/getopt_long.c substitute implementation
> does not accept abbreviated names for long options:
That is known, but since we don't advertise that feature, it's not a
problem.
> Barring objections, I'm going to modify our version to allow unique
> abbreviations too.
Sure, if you like.
> Should it be gettext'ified?
Probably.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
