On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 12:27:05PM +1300, Oliver Jowett wrote:
> Oliver Jowett wrote:
> >Having the close fail
> >because of an intervening savepoint rollback isn't great -- the error
> >will cause an unexpected failure of the current transaction.
>
> Never mind -- I just reread the protocol docs, and it's safe to close a
> nonexistant portal. Did this previously issue a warning, or something
> similar? I'm sure I had seen problems in this area in the past..
Not sure ... however I remember somebody complained because the SQL
level interface differed from the protocol level one on this point.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[@]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"In a specialized industrial society, it would be a disaster
to have kids running around loose." (Paul Graham)
