Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering
Date
Msg-id 20050123222134.GD67721@decibel.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-performance
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 03:40:03PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> There was some discussion in Toronto this week about storing bitmaps
> that would tell VACUUM whether or not there was any need to visit
> individual pages of each table.  Getting rid of useless scans through
> not-recently-changed areas of large tables would make for a significant
> reduction in the cost of VACUUM.
FWIW, that's already on the TODO. See also
http://lnk.nu/archives.postgresql.org/142.php.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant               decibel@decibel.org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Cheaper VACUUMing
Next
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Odd number of rows expected