On Friday 21 January 2005 09:06, Kris Jurka wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, Oliver Siegmar wrote:
> > The current infinity implementation in pgjdbc is a hack, because you have
> > to set/get magic values that represents '-infinity' and 'infinity', but
> > it is imho the best way to do until there might be an NEGATIVE_INFINITY
> > and POSITIVE_INFINTIY for java.util.Date like the one for
> > java.lang.Double.
>
> Well, no one seems to have any better ideas, how about a better place for
> the infinity constants. org.postgresql.jdbc2.TimestampUtils is not a
> public interface. PGStatement?
I vote for PGStatement :-)
Oliver
