Re: Is CVS HEAD open for 8.1 commits? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: Is CVS HEAD open for 8.1 commits?
Date
Msg-id 20050118115101.M96603@ganymede.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is CVS HEAD open for 8.1 commits?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Is CVS HEAD open for 8.1 commits?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: Is CVS HEAD open for 8.1 commits?  (Reinhard Max <max@suse.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> I'm not convinced Marc got the branching/tagging right; let's wait till
>>>> the dust settles.
>>
>>> I IM'ed him and he said to go ahead.
>>
>> Maybe he said that, but I see no evidence that he's tagged 8.0.0
>> correctly.  If you touch the repository you'll make it materially
>> harder to fix this.  So HOLD OFF, please.
>
> Too late, sorry.  Marc says the 8.0.0 is a tag and a branch.

Note that REL8_0_STABLE is the tag/branch ... HEAD should be clear to 
commit to ... the error that Tom was eluding to was that I had mis-named 
the original branch as REL8_0_0, instead of REL8_0_STABLE ... if someone 
knows how to safely remove a branch that has had no commits made to it, 
please let me know, but from reading the docs, the suggestions that seemed 
to be suggested had very big *BEWARE* signs around them ...

tags are easy to move around and remove, branches, apparently, aren't so 
simple ...

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: US Patents vs Non-US software ...
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Is CVS HEAD open for 8.1 commits?