Re: OID Usage - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: OID Usage
Date
Msg-id 200501152142.j0FLgwM11144@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: OID Usage  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>)
List pgsql-general
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 04:21:24PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org> writes:
> > > Out of curiosity, what clears out the old index tuples? Vacuum?
> >
> > Right.
>
> Which reminds me that you wanted to make VACUUM FULL do the equivalent
> of a REINDEX instead of retail deletion of index entries ... is that
> still the idea?  Would it do that always, or only under certain
> conditions?

Well, our TODO list still has under "Vacuum":

    * Improve speed with indexes

      For large table adjustements during vacuum, it is faster to reindex
      rather than update the index.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: ntinos@aueb.gr
Date:
Subject: Re: PQisBusy() always returns TRUE
Next
From: Berteun Damman
Date:
Subject: Re: Pgsql taking a *lot* of CPU time (unkillable).