Re: IBM releases 500 patents - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: IBM releases 500 patents
Date
Msg-id 20050115022412.GK67721@decibel.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: IBM releases 500 patents  (Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 10:28:52AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 10:33:44 -0800,
>   Elein Mustain <elein@tulip.norcov.com> wrote:
> > They probaly released the informix database patents.
> > This is pertinent to us as several of them were interesting
> > implementations of things like the function manager.
> 
> From what I read of this, the way they released the patents isn't completely
> compatible with BSD licenses.

Is the only concern the commercialized offerings of PostgreSQL? It seems
that commercial entities could either negotiate terms with IBM or help
maintain a 'patent-free' branch of PostgreSQL. Yes, sub-optimal and a
good amount of work, but depending on what's to be gained by utilizing
some of the patents it might still be better for PostgreSQL overall.

I don't know how useful the IP in the patents is, but I'd hate to see it
dismissed out-of-hand because of licensing difficulties that could be
overcome.
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant               decibel@decibel.org 
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: sparse (static analyzer) report
Next
From: "Benjamin Arai"
Date:
Subject: PostgreSQL Specification