Re: pgsql: get_names_for_var didn't do recursion for - Mailing list pgsql-committers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pgsql: get_names_for_var didn't do recursion for
Date
Msg-id 200501132140.j0DLeOq02131@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql: get_names_for_var didn't do recursion for  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-committers
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes:
> > With the several backend related changes that have gone in over the past
> > couple of days, are we looking at an RC6? :(
>
> Nothing that I've put in seems significant enough to need an RC6.  The
> only recent patch that really has any risk of destabilization is the one
> that caused RC5 (the SMgr hashtable backlink stuff).  I'd prefer to see
> people go full bore on testing RC5 than spend time updating to a new RC.

Agreed.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-committers by date:

Previous
From: petere@svr1.postgresql.org (Peter Eisentraut)
Date:
Subject: pgsql: Translation updates
Next
From: mha@pgfoundry.org (User Mha)
Date:
Subject: pginstaller - pginst: Use LoginUser() and CreateProcessAsUser() when the