Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
Date
Msg-id 20050112214346.GA29039@dcc.uchile.cl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)  (Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql@empires.org>)
Responses Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 12:41:38PM -0800, Jeff Davis wrote:

> Except then the two heaps would have to be joined somehow for every
> operation. It makes sense some times to (if you have a very wide table)
> split off the rarely-accessed attributes into a seperate table to be
> joined one-to-one when those attributes are needed. To have the system
> do that automatically would create problems if the attributes that are
> split off are frequently accessed, right?

That mechanism exists right now, and it's called TOAST, dubbed the best
thing since sliced bread.  We even have documentation for it, new as of
our latest RC:

http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/storage-toast.html

-- 
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[@]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"El día que dejes de cambiar dejarás de vivir"


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marek Mosiewicz"
Date:
Subject: Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PANIC: right sibling's left-link doesn't match