Re: Win32 version numbers not correct (again, but this one - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Win32 version numbers not correct (again, but this one
Date
Msg-id 200412310116.iBV1GIF22965@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Win32 version numbers not correct (again, but this one is easy)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Win32 version numbers not correct (again, but this one is easy)
List pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:
> > Version numbers don't update properly on postgres.exe when doing make
> > clean/make. It works for all other exes and dlls. I beleive this is just
> > a case of "make clean" not properly removing "win32ver.o". See attached
> > patch.
>
> Hmm, is that the only place we missed it?  Might be worth diffing a make
> distclean'd tree against a virgin one.

I was under the impression we only wanted a new version number with a
configure run, however, I can see that "make clean" perhaps should do it
too.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bgwriter behavior
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Win32 version numbers not correct (again, but this one is easy)