Re: Seqscan rather than Index - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Steinar H. Gunderson
Subject Re: Seqscan rather than Index
Date
Msg-id 20041217220907.GA10313@uio.no
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Seqscan rather than Index  ("Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>)
Responses Re: Seqscan rather than Index
List pgsql-performance
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 10:56:27PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> I'm a bit unsure -- should counting ~3 million rows (no OIDs, PG 7.4,
> everything in cache, 32-byte rows) take ~3500ms on an Athlon 64 2800+?

(I realize I was a bit unclear here. This is a completely separate case, not
related to the original poster -- I was just wondering if what I'm seeing is
normal or not.)

/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Pailloncy Jean-Gerard
Date:
Subject: Re: Error in VACUUM FULL VERBOSE ANALYZE (not enough memory)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Error in VACUUM FULL VERBOSE ANALYZE (not enough memory)