Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > One difficulty was generating a new version of libpq.rc at the proper
> > time. I added a prepdist rule just like *.def. I also added code so
> > every time you do a 'make clean' or distclean it does a 'touch' on
> > libpq.rc.in so libpq.rc is rebuilt on the next compile. That seemed
> > like the cleanest solution.
>
> ... except CVS will not like it at all. Why don't you just remove the
> libpq.rc file instead?
I am going to remove libpq.rc from CVS because it is now a derived file
from libpq.rc.in. I don't remove via 'clean' because if someone wants
to build VC or BCC and Win32 with the same tarball then once they do a
'clean' they can't do a VC or BCC compile anymore.
Does that answer your question?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
