Re: Multiple foreign keys on same field - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ciprian Popovici
Subject Re: Multiple foreign keys on same field
Date
Msg-id 20041216001540.18620f55@xxx
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Multiple foreign keys on same field  (Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>)
List pgsql-general
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 23:00:45 -0700 Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org> wrote:
> Do you mean that you don't need foreign key constraints to enforce
> referential integrity, but only to cascade changes to another table?
> If so, have you considered using triggers instead?  Or have I
> misunderstood what you're trying to do?

No, you understood right. Yes, I will have to go with triggers instead.
Thanks for the input.

--
Ciprian Popovici

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: is there a repair utility for postgresql?
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: UNION with more restrictive DISTINCT