Re: Win 32 'could not attach to proper memory at fixed address' - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Win 32 'could not attach to proper memory at fixed address'
Date
Msg-id 200412131840.iBDIeE701624@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Win 32 'could not attach to proper memory at fixed address'  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Win 32 'could not attach to proper memory at fixed address'  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Added to TODO for Win32:
> >         o Allow the shared memory address to be configured via GUC
> > This is something we knew might be required and now I think it is
> > required.  Using a fixed address was always pretty crazy.
>
> I see no proof of that at all in this bug report.  The postmaster has
> evidently managed to create the segment, so the address per se is not
> the problem.

Really?  You do realize we just choose a fixed address on Win32, right?

I will remove the item and see how it plays out though.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Win 32 'could not attach to proper memory at fixed address'
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Win 32 'could not attach to proper memory at fixed address'