Re: Doc patch needed: encodings? - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Doc patch needed: encodings?
Date
Msg-id 200412062002.43906.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Doc patch needed: encodings?  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Doc patch needed: encodings?
List pgsql-docs
Josh Berkus wrote:
> In US distributions it's a recent thing.   The switch to non-C
> locales is a recent thing; RH Enterprise 3.0, and SuSE 9.0.

I have it on record that Red Hat has set a non-C locale by default at
least since Red Hat 6.1 as distributed in North America (aren't they
the same anyway?) in 1999.  I know that because we had this exact
discussion back then.

> I'd like to have an explanation of this somewhere else newbies are
> liable to read it, *before* their first production "LIKE" query
> doesn't use an index. Where would be appropriate?

Near the documentation of "LIKE".

> And, for English speakers, what exactly is wrong with using 'C'
> locale instead of the environment one?

It makes it difficult to write a résumé, to name one thing.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: Doc patch needed: encodings?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Doc patch needed: encodings?