Re: WIN1252 encoding - backend or not? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: WIN1252 encoding - backend or not?
Date
Msg-id 200412041904.iB4J4s609728@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIN1252 encoding - backend or not?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: WIN1252 encoding - backend or not?
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > As far as the patch itself, I don't think I ever claimed it was ready
> > for prime time --- rather, I followed process and it was applied.
> 
> Applying it on the day before we go RC is claiming that it is ready for
> prime time.  As Jan already told you, the "process" may include applying
> patches by default during devel cycle, but it can't work that way in
> late beta.

OK, so what do we want the process to be?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: WIN1252 encoding - backend or not?
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: WIN1252 encoding - backend or not?