Re: Buildfarm coverage (was Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kenneth Marshall
Subject Re: Buildfarm coverage (was Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6)
Date
Msg-id 20041203203310.GG8029@it.is.rice.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Buildfarm coverage (was Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Buildfarm coverage (was Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 03:20:48PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > 1. Buildfarm doesn't yet have that many platforms on it.
> 
> It's not as bad as all that.  Our current list of supported platforms
> (ie, things that got tested last time) is
> 
>     AIX
>     Free/Open/NetBSD    covered by buildfarm
>     HPUX            used daily by moi
>     IRIX
>     Linux            covered by buildfarm
>     OS X            tested pretty often by moi
>     Solaris            covered by buildfarm
>     Tru64
>     UnixWare
>     Windows/Cygwin        covered by buildfarm
> 
> With respect to hardware it's
> 
>     x86            covered by buildfarm
>     ia64
>     x86_64            covered by buildfarm
>     ARM
>     Alpha
>     MIPS            covered by buildfarm
>     m68k
>     PA-RISC            used daily by moi
>     PPC            tested pretty often by moi
>     RS6000            isn't this same as PPC?
This is the IBM Power4 and now Power5 architecture which is
different from the PowerPC.

Ken


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Buildfarm coverage (was Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Buildfarm coverage (was Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6)