Re: Who's a "Corporate Sponsor"? - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Robert Bernier
Subject Re: Who's a "Corporate Sponsor"?
Date
Msg-id 200412031418.43416.robert.bernier5@sympatico.ca
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Who's a "Corporate Sponsor"?  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On December 3, 2004 02:15 pm, Josh Berkus wrote:
> So the developers of phpPgAdmin don't count?   And JDBC?  And Slony?  and
> PostGIS? and eRServer?   Do I make my point here?  How does is benefit
> PostgreSQL to exclude so many?
>
> Given that over the next few years we can expect to put an increasing
> amount of code into "add-ins" and less and less code into the core, I think
> not listing optional add-in contributors would be very short-sighted.
> *especially* since it's Core, NOT the contributors, who gets to decide
> what's in the main code and what's not.

Maybe we should acknowledge corporate contribution period. The challenge is to
arrive at a standard that everyone can agree.

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Who's a "Corporate Sponsor"?
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: Who's a "Corporate Sponsor"?