Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I hope this does not indicate that you are planning to commit that patch
> >> on the day before RC1.
>
> > I am applying it. It was added to the queue yesterday or the day
> > before. I don't consider it a feature addition but rather an addition
> > for portability with Win32. I don't see how it affects anything unless
> > you use that encoding.
>
> If it contains any core-dump-grade bugs, it can be used to cause denial
> of service on any platform. And how can you possibly not consider it a
> feature addition?
>
> I'll hold still for now, but if I see so much as one compiler warning
> out of it, it's going away again.
Well, it is of less risk than the vacuum changes you made earlier this
week that caused regression failures.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073